The experiment was set up thusly: A
room with a camera and a computer arm and voice synthesizer an
experimenter for the computer and an observer. The experimenter would
put a coin in the robots hand and it would flip the coin. If possible
it picks up the coin from flip to flip. It would call out the coin
based on a single 'ping' from the observer who inputs the future
source set slightly after the experiment. There is a table outside
the room with a tv which replays the experiment and provides the
buttons for the heads/tails 'ping'. It also has an 'abort' button
which disables the arm, which is generally used after the experiment
to reset the detector for the next trial.
The first twenty trials are two coins
tosses, then twenty trials with three coin flips (etc)
The experimenter goes through the first
twenty trials without much trouble. However the third coin toss never
happens, the signal for the reset button is too strong and the
machine is conditioned to two trials before resetting.
The experiment is reset, using the
minimal voltage for the reset button to clear the state. The
experiment goes well for the next 20 two flip trials, but the
experimenter is conditioned to end the trial after two flips. The
machine, now fixed, is ready to flip the coin a third time. They
both reach for the coin at the same time and the experimenters hand
is stabbed by the computer arm.
The observer goes outside to record the
results. He pushes the buttons for the first two flips and, not
wanting to watch the experimenters hand get stabbed again, decides to
hit the reset button.
The experimenter leaves the room his
hand now undamaged, wondering why the observer decided to abort the
experiment after only two coin tosses, when they were clearly on the
third.
They replay the video and it shows the
experimenter's hand being damaged, even though it is not.
____
As with the Schroedinger cat
experiment, measurements are in a state of flux until observed. The
observation of the hand injury in no way forces that event to happen,
it is merely one quantum state. Back influence on the experiment
with the reset button is equally valid as long as there is an
alternate observation. The experimenter leaving the room with the
undamaged hand proves the validity of that quantum state. The
temporal split happens when the observer has the choice on whether or
not to hit the reset button after seeing the second flip.
No comments:
Post a Comment